Dear Invigilator

Featured

Like excellent waiters and the best referees, you are scarcely noticed. Only ever heard when absolutely necessary.  You are watchful: you judge your interventions with expert knowledge of the rules of the examination game.  You are mindful of the one-take-movie pressure bearing down on all those young heads that are earnestly bowed over their examination desks.  You emanate a calm and enabling control.  You invigilate.

In schools across the land, the sports halls, gyms and assembly rooms have undergone their annual springtime metamorphosis. The Public Examination season is underway again. Desks have been lined up at regulation distance.  Institutional clocks have been synchronised.  Notices have been posted.  ‘Silence please – exams in progress’.

And with all this annual examination activity, you appear: a seasonal creature, with beady eye and soft step. It’s your time to shine. Or rather, it’s your time unobtrusively to enable the candidates to shine. Examination conditions apply. And it is you who applies them. The examination invigilator.

When I was doing exams, it was mostly the teachers that did the invigilating.  And some were more vigilant than others. A few did their marking whilst shooting the occasional glance across the exam room.  Others were noisy prowlers, coughers, fidgeters.  You sensed their presence and a corner of your mind had to deal with them: there was a nagging awareness of their movements. 

Not so now. The invigilator is a specialist. And rightly so. Not only because teachers have lots of even better things they could be doing with their skills than patrolling exam halls, but because invigilation is an art. Maybe even a calling.

Invigilators are masters of silent observation.  Noiselessly gliding with rubber-soled stealth up and down the aisles of countless exam halls. Cat-like, you slink down the lines, paws poised to make a corrective tap.  Ready to pounce with a treasury tag; an extra booklet of paper; a moment of expert assistance. An intervention.

Easy, perhaps, for the candidate to think lowly of the invigilator.  Maybe some perceive you as a troubling part of the examination challenge; a minor menace in the labyrinth; a grim-faced bearer of the examination paper.  Those reckless foolish few bent on misdeeds may view you as referee to be gamed.  Or, perhaps it’s easier not to think of you at all. 

This would be to undervalue and misunderstand the role of the invigilator.  She or he is the person in the examination room immediately responsible for upholding the integrity of the external assessment process.  Integrity: an evocative value word – what word appears above integrity in the pantheon of virtues?  Not many.  This is a noble responsibility.  And it is much more than patrolling. 

The Joint Council for Qualifications* (JCQ) details the invigilator’s role as: ensuring all candidates have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their abilities; ensuring the security of the examination before, during and after the examination; preventing possible candidate malpractice; preventing possible administrative failures.

Malpractice is incredibly rare – because schools take their duties seriously; and because invigilators are professionals. As the invigilator’s eagle-eyes scan the examination hall, these duties are her professional creed. Fairness; equal opportunity; ensuring things go as well as they can for the candidates.

So, dear invigilator, as you survey the room, I wonder what noble thoughts fill your mind. Do you recite the creed of your occupation like a mantra? Do you compose shopping lists or make travel itineraries? As you share and curate silence, what thoughts to do have?

The great meditators of Buddhism repeat to themselves a simple wish: ‘May all beings be happy!’.  What would be the mantra of the examination invigilator?  As the candidates sit at their desks, we would hope that they are in a state of flow.  The invigilator must, of course, be neutral, a silent beacon of integrity. A sentinel.  

I know you have to keep your mind on the job.  But the watchman’s mind is always free to think its thoughts.  And as you do, I harbour the hope that some aspect of your mind’s power is given to a general emanation of goodwill to the young minds you are overseeing.

May all examination halls be well invigilated.  Under examination conditions.  And with kindness. 



*The Joint Council for Qualifications is a membership organisation comprising the eight largest providers of qualifications in the UK. The JCQ provides a single voice for its members on issues of examination administration and, when appropriate, qualification and wider education policy.

Dear Minister for Exams

Featured

There is something in the air. In fact, everything seems to be up in the air just at the moment.  I’m not only talking about the logistics of the Summer 2021 exam session – though some good sense and clarity on that would be good. I really hope that you listen to the experts: those who teach and support children.

It’s the whole thing, really. It feels as though it’s time you took a long hard look at yourself.

You’re probably way too busy to read letters. I’ll bet you get a lot. Such as this one; or the one I sent to the paper the other day, suggesting that we have a golden opportunity to re-think how pupils’ learning and wider skills are assessed. 

Daily Telegraph, 7th October 2020

This is a big picture discussion that would need to be held across the width and breadth of education.  When GCSEs were invented, the school leaving age was 16.  Children in England are assessed by written test more than most others on the planet.  As we all know, written tests are not the only measure of a person. Time for a re-think, surely?

Rethinking assessment – a cross-sector alliance

I should perhaps emphasise that Shrewsbury pupils do very well indeed on the current diet.  Our GCSE results are excellent. We prepare our pupils well and they succeed in these examinations. In that narrow sense, nothing’s broken from our point of view.  These assessments are a significant part of the story but our teaching extends beyond the set curriculum; we aim to explore and instil a true love of learning.  Character strengths, skills and aptitudes are developed outside the classroom: through sport, music, drama, expressive arts, leadership, enterprise and adventure, to name a few. 

Learning cross-fertilises and our pupils are recognised and developed not just in the exam hall but across a wide field of activity.  This is what we call ‘whole person education’: the intellective development, which is in part measured by examinations, is allied to active, expressive and reflective learning.  The process is about becoming fully human and developing Salopian virtues that will last a lifetime.

Shrewsbury has a long history of asking difficult questions and being willing to challenge the status quo.  Is our examination system fair?  Can we influence it to be fairer, more holistic, more responsive to the teachers’ knowledge of the children– more fully human. How can we exercise our independence to provide a broad and holistic curriculum?  Recent history shows that we are seizing opportunities here: the introduction of the Institute of Leadership and Management Young Leaders Award and the creation of Shrewsbury U, for example.

I know we’re all struggling day to day. Big thinking takes time and effort – and genuine will to address issues. At a national, system level, there is a debate to be had. This feels like the time.

I have two questions for you, the fictional Minister for Exams:

Question 1: Is there a better, fairer, more human way to assess our children?

Question 2: Read Brian Patten’s great poem, The Minister for Exams? And discuss.

Brian Patten
Brian Patten
‘How shallow is the soul of the Minister for Exams?’

Is there are better, fairer, more human way to assess our children?

Dear Gavin

Featured

This is an update on your examination in educational leadership. This is being conducted by continuous assessment. There are no specimen or past papers: this is a new specification. Examination conditions have been altered due to lockdown. You may confer as much as you like.  There are no easy answers.  There are are many invigilators.

You may not re-sit. However, adjustments can be made to your answers at any point. You may not appeal your result. Yet. You may withdraw at any point and allow a substitute to complete your examination.

Your interim provisional result status has been assessed by a panel of experts and non-experts. You are currently below the pass mark on the following key areas of this new specification:

  1. Communication
  2. Decision-making
  3. Fairness

The assessment is nearly complete. You are still able to adjust your answers in light of your assessors’ comments. Even at this late stage.  

We are aware that you are taking this assessment under extraordinary circumstances. You may submit a special consideration form.  An algorithm will then be applied in calculating your final result.

Time to reflect, Gavin.